94 red hawk 9.5k miles collector quality for sale

94hawk368 · Post by **94hawk368** » Tue Apr 20, 2004 6:07 pm

looks like nobody's interested 19k a little to high ? this car is super high quality now 18.8k for those in the market for an lt1 powered car why buy a high mileage car when for a few more thousand you can buy what amounts to a brand new car? this car has been pampered its a must see !!! no dissapointments!!!

Kataklysm · Post by **Kataklysm** » Wed Apr 21, 2004 8:31 pm

Price is very high, I think more people would rather go out and buy a 99 for the same price.

LittleBef15 · Post by **LittleBef15** » Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:46 pm

I just got a 99 NBM with t-tops and everything for 16.8K. It has 29K on it and IMO it looks better and performs better than a 95. I would drop the price some.

Rob(94Hawk#319) · Post by **Rob(94Hawk#319)** » Wed Apr 21, 2004 11:06 pm

LittleBef15 wrote:I just got a 99 NBM with t-tops and everything for 16.8K. It has 29K on it and IMO it looks better and performs better than a 95. I would drop the price some.

It may be all that, but the 95's where a true limited production car. Not just limited to how many they can sell.

My $.02

________________
Rob
1994 Firehawk#319
11.83@120.61
Slightly Modified
1996 Blown V6
2002 Trailblazer
San Diego F-Bodies
"Garp bit Bonky."

94hawk368 · Post by **94hawk368** » Mon Apr 26, 2004 9:41 am

Yes , the price is on the high side but this is a high quality car with 9.4 original miles Im not sure if you would be able to find a 99 with that low mileage even if you did they are 5 years newer I would still be willing to bet it wouldnt be as clean as mine unless it was only driven on dry summer nights this car is like brand new never abused or molested all stock with the exception of the battery and air filter I have seen 1993-1995 hawks with 20 -50 k miles with asking prices of 13.5 -16.5k of course thats just the asking price but for a few more bucks you could have a prestine car that was never used as a daily driver , if I cant get 18k for it I have no problem keeping it I dont need the money I could however use the space in my garage also Im not sure but I do think more 99's were produced which makes the 94 's more rare, thanks for trying to help but again 18k is as low as I will go

Firehawk 007 · Post by **Firehawk 007** » Wed Apr 28, 2004 9:37 am

Try listing it on the DuPont Registry. Kudos to you for holding out for the right price. Sounds like a sweet ride with very low miles!

XLT4Hawk · Post by **XLT4Hawk** » Wed Apr 28, 2004 2:36 pm

The 93-97 cars in the future will be worth more money, even though the LS1 engine performs better. There are a lot fewer of the LT1 cars and this was the car that started the whole craze for modern SS camaros, ws6 birds, hawks, etc..............This car made SLP with that 13.5 1/4 mile in 1994. There are many, many ram air ls1 cars out there. And the 99-02 is not better looking, maybe if you like space ships, the newer firebirds are just another example of pontiac cladding gone wrong..........LT1 ram air cars are so clean. A regular person could barely tell the difference between the LS1 style firehawk hood and a v6 hood; dont get me wrong, I love the LS1 but think they are ugly as hell; thats why I bought an 01 cobra instead of a 01 hawk.

ANGUS · Post by **ANGUS** » Wed Apr 28, 2004 3:07 pm

Everyone has their own opinion about cars. I would love to get a 97 Hawk when mine is paid off. That way I have the LT1 and LS1 version.

Kataklysm · Post by **Kataklysm** » Wed Apr 28, 2004 8:22 pm

I'd go for LT4 over any other one